Rule Text (verbatim from The Florida Bar)
(a) Duty to Explain Process to Client. A lawyer must obtain
the informed consent of a client in a family law matter before
proceeding in the collaborative law process after providing the client
with sufficient information about the collaborative law process,
including, but not limited to, the following:
(1) the material benefits and risks of using the
collaborative law process to resolve a family law matter;
(2) the nature and scope of the matter to be resolved
through the collaborative law process;
(3) alternatives to the collaborative law process;
(4) that participation in the collaborative law process is
voluntary and any client may unilaterally terminate the
collaborative law process for any reason;
(5) that the collaborative law process will terminate if
any participating client initiates a proceeding or seeks court
intervention in a pending proceeding related to the collaborative law
matter after the clients have signed the collaborative law agreement;
(6) limitations on the lawyer’s participation in
subsequent proceedings imposed by family law court rules on the
collaborative law process; and
(7) fees and costs the client can reasonably expect to
incur in the collaborative law process, including the fees of the
lawyers, mental health professionals, and financial professionals.
(b) Written Agreement Required. A lawyer is prohibited
from representing a client in the collaborative process in a family
law matter unless all participating lawyers and clients sign a
written agreement that includes:
(1) a statement of the clients’ intent to resolve a matter
through the collaborative law process under these rules;
(2) a description of the nature and scope of the matter;
(3) identification of the lawyers participating in the
collaborative law process and which client(s) they represent;
(4) that the clients will make timely, full, candid and
informal disclosure of information related to the collaborative
matter without formal discovery and will promptly update
previously disclosed information that has materially changed;
(5) that participation in the collaborative law process is
voluntary and any client may unilaterally terminate the
collaborative law process for any reason;
(6) that the collaborative law process will terminate if
any participating client initiates a proceeding or seeks court
intervention in a pending proceeding related to the collaborative law
matter after the clients have signed the collaborative law agreement;
and
(7) that the clients understand that their lawyers may
not represent the clients or any other person before a court in a
proceeding related to the collaborative law matter except as
provided by court rule.
(c) Duty to Address Domestic Violence. A lawyer must
reasonably inquire whether a client has a history of any coercive or
violent relationship with another party in a family law matter before
agreeing to represent a client in the collaborative law process and
must make reasonable efforts to continue to assess whether a
coercive or violent relationship exists between parties in a family
law matter throughout the collaborative law process. A lawyer may
not represent a client in the collaborative law process in a family
law matter and must terminate the client-lawyer relationship in an
existing collaborative law process in a family law matter if the
lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer’s client has a history of
any coercive or violent relationship with another party in the matter
unless:
(1) the client requests to begin or continue the
collaborative law process; and
(2) the lawyer reasonably believes that the safety of the
client can be protected during the collaborative law process.
Educational reference. This page summarizes a Florida Rule of Professional Conduct for educational purposes. The rule text and Comment are mirrored from the Florida Bar's official publication and are public domain. The plain-English summary and any commentary are the opinion of Phillips, Hunt & Walker and are general information only — not legal advice. Reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. If you believe a Florida lawyer has violated this rule, you can file a complaint with The Florida Bar at floridabar.org. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
What this rule means in plain English
If you and the other side both want to resolve your Florida family law dispute through the collaborative process — where each side has a lawyer but everyone agrees to negotiate rather than litigate — this rule controls. The lawyers and parties must sign a written agreement. If collaboration breaks down, the collaborative lawyers must withdraw before any litigation; new counsel takes over. The rule protects the integrity of the collaborative-vs-litigation choice.
Florida Bar Ethics Opinions interpreting this rule
- Opinion 85-2 (1985)
<p>If a lawyer acted as intermediary in a private adoption and the natural parents' identity was never meant to be disclosed to the adoptive parents, the lawyer cannot later reveal those identities — even to help the adoptive parents sue the natural parents over expenses paid. The duty of confidentiality survives the matter ending unsuccessfully.</p>
Read on floridabar.org →
Comment (verbatim from The Florida Bar)
The collaborative law process involves the nonadversarial
resolution of disputes through voluntary settlement procedures.
Florida statutes and court rules permit collaborative law to resolve
disputes in family law. Lawyers engaging in the collaborative law
process in family law matters must comply with legislative and
court requirements regarding the process. As part of this
nonadversarial and voluntary resolution of disputes, lawyers who
engage in the collaborative law process in a family law matter, and
any other lawyers in that lawyer’s firm, may not afterwards
represent any party in any related proceeding except to request that
a court approve the settlement reached during the collaborative law
process or in specified emergency situations in accordance with
family law court rules.
Before agreeing with the client to proceed in the collaborative
law process in a family law matter, a lawyer should first consider
whether a client is an appropriate candidate for the collaborative
law process and must provide the client with sufficient information
regarding the benefits and risks of the process, including the
lawyer’s limitations regarding subsequent proceedings. See also
rules 4-1.4 and 4-1.2. To determine whether a client is a good
candidate for the collaborative law process, the lawyer must inquire
regarding any history of coercive or violent relationships with any
other persons who would be parties to the collaborative law process
in the family law matter. See also rules 4-1.1 and 4-1.2. The
lawyer also must provide the client with information about other
reasonably available alternatives to resolve the family law matter,
which may include litigation, mediation, arbitration, or expert
evaluation. See also rule 4-1.4. The lawyer should assess whether
the client is likely to cooperate in voluntary discovery and discuss
that process with the client. See rules 4-1.1 and 4-1.2. The lawyer
should also advise the client that the collaborative law process will
terminate if any party initiates litigation or other court intervention
in the matter after signing a collaborative law agreement. Id. The
lawyer should discuss with the client the fact that the collaborative
law process is voluntary and any party to a collaborative law
agreement may terminate the process at any time. Id. The lawyer
must provide the client with information about costs the client can
reasonably expect to incur, including fees and costs of all
professionals involved. See rules 4-1.4 and 4-1.5.
An agreement between a lawyer and client to engage in the
collaborative law process is a form of limited representation which
must comply with all requirements of limited scope representations,
including the requirement that the client must give informed
consent in writing. See rule 4-1.2(c). The agreement between
lawyer and client should include the nature and scope of the matter
to be resolved through the collaborative law process, the material
benefits and risks to participating in the collaborative law process,
and the limitations on the lawyer’s representation.
If a client agrees to participate in the collaborative law process
and then terminates the process or initiates litigation regarding the
dispute, the lawyer should terminate the representation. See rule
4-1.16.
Added May 18, 2017, effective July 1, 2017 (218 So.3d 440); amended Jan.
4, 2019, effective March 5, 2019 (267 So.3d 891).
4-2. COUNSELOR