§ 90.612, Fla. Stat. — Mode and Order of Interrogation (Leading Questions)
Plain English
This rule hands the judge the gavel over how testimony unfolds — and it contains the famous leading-questions rule. The court controls the mode and order of questioning to get at the truth, avoid wasting time, and protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment. Cross-examination is generally limited to the subject matter of the direct plus the witness’s credibility (the judge may allow more). And the headline: leading questions — ones that suggest their own answer — are not allowed on direct examination, except as needed to develop the testimony, but they are the norm on cross. When you call a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party, you may lead them even on direct. The judge must take special care with witnesses under age 14.
From the Courtroom
“Objection — leading” is the most common interruption you’ll hear on direct. The cure is simple but disciplined: ask open questions — who, what, where, when, how — and let the witness tell the story in their own words. Save the leading questions for cross, where you control the witness and the answer. The lawyer who leads their own witness looks like they’re testifying for them.
Key Points & Authority
- § 90.612(1)–(2), Fla. Stat. — The judge controls the mode and order of questioning; cross-examination is limited to the scope of direct plus credibility, subject to the court’s discretion.
- § 90.612(3): leading questions are improper on direct (except to develop testimony) and ordinarily proper on cross; a hostile witness, adverse party, or witness identified with an adverse party may be led on direct.
- Federal parallel: Fed. R. Evid. 611 (numbering offset — Florida’s 90.612 maps to federal 611).
Federal Parallel
The federal counterpart is Fed. R. Evid. 611 (numbering offset by one). It covers the same ground — the court’s control over interrogation, the scope of cross-examination, and the leading-question rules.
About this rule walkthrough
Part of The Evidence Code, hosted by John M. Phillips — Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer, Court TV analyst, admitted in 8 states + 9 federal districts + SCOTUS.
Free consultation: (904) 444-4444 · About John Phillips
Educational only — not legal advice.
Rule Text (verbatim from the Florida Supreme Court)
(1) The judge shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of the interrogation of witnesses and the presentation of evidence, so as to: (a) Facilitate, through effective interrogation and presentation, the discovery of the truth. (b) Avoid needless consumption of time. (c) Protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
(2) Cross-examination of a witness is limited to the subject matter of the direct examination and matters affecting the credibility of the witness. The court may, in its discretion, permit inquiry into additional matters.
(3) Leading questions should not be used on the direct examination of a witness except as may be necessary to develop the witness’s testimony. Ordinarily, leading questions should be permitted on cross-examination. When a party calls a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party, interrogation may be by leading questions.
The judge shall take special care to protect a witness under age 14 from questions that are in a form that cannot reasonably be understood by a person of the age and understanding of the witness, and shall take special care to restrict the unnecessary repetition of questions.
Educational reference. Educational only — not legal advice.
What this rule means in plain English
Section 90.612 gives the court control over the mode and order of questioning, limits cross-examination to the scope of direct plus credibility, and bars leading questions on direct (except to develop testimony) while allowing them on cross and for hostile/adverse witnesses.