Skip to Main Content
The Evidence Code · Topic Guide
Settlement, Pleas & Insurance Evidence — Florida and Federal Court
§§ 90.408–90.410, Fla. Stat. · Fed. R. Evid. 408–411 · Phillips, Hunt & Walker

These four rules exist because the law would rather have candor and generosity than perfect proof. Compromise offers, medical-expense payments, plea negotiations, and liability insurance are all things we want parties to be able to discuss, offer, or carry without those choices being weaponized against them in court. That policy — not any concern about reliability — is what keeps this evidence out.

The compromise rule — Rule 408 / § 90.408

Fed. R. Evid. 408 · § 90.408, Fla. Stat.

Two categories of evidence are inadmissible to prove or disprove the validity or amount of a disputed claim, or to impeach by prior inconsistent statement or contradiction:

  • Furnishing, promising, or offering — or accepting, promising to accept, or offering to accept — valuable consideration in compromising or attempting to compromise the claim; and
  • Conduct or a statement made during compromise negotiations about the claim.

Two doctrinal points that catch litigators off guard

  • The claim must be disputed. A flat admission of an undisputed debt is not protected by Rule 408 because there is no dispute to compromise.
  • Federal criminal carve-out. Negotiation statements made to a public office in the exercise of its regulatory, investigative, or enforcement authority are admissible in a later criminal case even though they would be excluded in the underlying civil matter. Florida’s § 90.408 does not contain the same express carve-out.

What is not excluded

Rule 408 does not exclude evidence offered for a purpose other than proving the claim, such as:

  • Proving a witness’s bias or prejudice;
  • Negating a contention of undue delay;
  • Proving an effort to obstruct a criminal investigation or prosecution.

Medical expenses — Rule 409 / § 90.409

Fed. R. Evid. 409 · § 90.409, Fla. Stat.

Furnishing, promising to pay, or offering to pay medical, hospital, or similar expenses resulting from an injury is not admissible to prove liability. Purpose: encourage the humanitarian gesture without turning it into an admission of fault.

Narrower than Rule 408. Rule 409 protects only the payment or offer — not accompanying statements of fault. “I’ll cover your bills” is protected. “I’ll cover your bills because I ran the light” is not protected as to the admission.

Plea statements — Rule 410 / § 90.410

Fed. R. Evid. 410 · § 90.410, Fla. Stat.

In a civil or criminal case, the following are inadmissible against the defendant who made the plea or participated in the plea discussions:

  • A guilty plea that was later withdrawn;
  • A nolo contendere plea;
  • A statement made during a Rule 11 (or comparable state) plea colloquy; and
  • A statement made during plea discussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authority, if the discussions did not result in a guilty plea or resulted in a later-withdrawn guilty plea.

Exceptions and waiver

  • Rule of completeness pairing. A plea-discussion statement may be admitted where another statement from the same discussion has been introduced.
  • Perjury and false statements. A statement is admissible in a perjury or false-statement prosecution if made under oath, on the record, and with counsel present.
  • Waiver. Rule 410 protections can be waived by agreement. Many cooperation agreements and proffer letters include express waivers; such waivers have generally been enforced. Read any cooperation agreement carefully.
  • Only statements to the prosecutor. The protection covers negotiations with the prosecuting attorney, not statements to police officers.

Liability insurance — Rule 411 (federal)

Fed. R. Evid. 411 — evidence that a person was or was not insured against liability is not admissible to prove whether the person acted negligently or otherwise wrongfully. But the court may admit this evidence for another purpose, such as proving witness bias or prejudice, or agency, ownership, or control.

Florida has no direct Chapter 90 counterpart. Florida excludes liability-insurance evidence on the negligence issue through case law and the general relevance rules (§§ 90.402–90.403).

Practical points from the trial bar

  • Frame the offer. When offering settlement evidence, articulate a non-fault purpose on the record.
  • Get 408 protection right in the letter. Mark negotiation correspondence “For Settlement Purposes Only — Fed. R. Evid. 408 / § 90.408, Fla. Stat.”
  • Watch the “disputed claim” element. Keep the acknowledgments to disputed matters.
  • Regulatory settlements. Obtain non-waiver commitments in writing when negotiating with an agency in a matter that could go criminal.
  • Rule 409 is narrow. Keep the medical-payment communication separate from anything that could be construed as an admission.
  • Rule 410 waivers. Read every proffer letter and cooperation agreement carefully.
  • Rule 411 exceptions. Do not concede them. If bias, agency, ownership, or control is contested, demand a limiting instruction.

Related topics

About this topic guide

Part of The Evidence Code, hosted by John M. Phillips — Board Certified Civil Trial Attorney, past president of the Jacksonville Justice Association, and lead trial counsel in state and federal courts across eight states. Phillips, Hunt & Walker maintains rule-book pages for the Florida Evidence Code (Chapter 90), the Federal Rules of Evidence, and the leading Florida procedural rule sets so that lawyers, paralegals, and litigants can find the authority they need in plain English with the citations that let them verify it.

Referrals welcome. If a settlement, plea, or coverage-related evidence fight is coming, contact us here.

Educational summary of Florida and federal evidence law; not legal advice. The current statutory and rule text controls; verify at flsenate.gov and law.cornell.edu before relying.

X